Starfield was initially intended to be the next generation RPG, but Baldur’s Gate 3 ultimately claimed that role, prompting the former to adjust its release date to avoid competing with the highly anticipated Bethesda RPG. Baldur’s Gate 3 was determined to steer clear of Starfield’s influence, as the latter was already being hyped as the “next Skyrim” and expected to be a groundbreaking game with enduring appeal.
Starfield faced several challenges. Its gameplay felt outdated, resembling titles from previous gaming eras.
The promised expansive galaxy with “infinite possibilities” turned out to be shallow and uninteresting, lacking the depth and excitement found in Bethesda’s previous open worlds. Additionally, the combat was laborious and lacked any redeeming qualities.
Conversely, Baldur’s Gate 3 emerged as a refreshing and innovative RPG with meticulously crafted, intricate maps featuring rich and diverse characters. The game’s depth continues to captivate players, who discover new elements and strategies even months after its release, fostering a vibrant community.
While Baldur’s Gate 3 naturally cultivated a devoted fan base, Starfield’s attempts to mimic the success of earlier titles, such as Skyrim and Fallout 4, felt forced and contrived. Starfield’s empty spaces failed to inspire the same sense of belonging and creativity that had driven the modding community in Skyrim.
Ultimately, Baldur’s Gate 3 has organically developed a community that genuinely cares about the game, whereas Starfield seems to have pursued success through a calculated, clinical approach that lacks the heart and soul present in its predecessor. As a result, it’s anticipated that Baldur’s Gate 3 will continue to be celebrated for years to come, while Starfield may not leave a lasting impression.
